Institutional assurance
A controlled public view of the governance, security, privacy, intellectual-property and deployment principles that frame the platform. TAA and TPV are distinct inventions; SECO and AOM have separate defined roles; sensitive implementation detail remains restricted.
Trust architecture
The Trust Center separates what can be verified publicly from what belongs in a qualified confidential review.
Public material describes the before-and-after compromise objective, transaction-security principles and trust controls without exposing protected anti-coercion, enrolment, validation or security-sensitive mechanisms.
Responsible security contact →Public and private layers are separated. Institutional workflows should collect only information needed for qualification, operations, governance or a defined transaction.
Privacy statement →Patent applications relating to the distinct TAA and TPV inventions were transmitted to and received by OAPI in March 2026. TAA-TPV refers to their combined framework; the website does not claim granted or worldwide patent rights.
IP statement →TAA SECO is the platform and master brand. TAA is the first invention, TPV the second, SECO a public security-identification code derived from TAA, and AOM an affiliation and mission-verification service enabled by TAA/SECO.
Technology architecture →Technology/IP leadership and strategy/structuring responsibilities are separately identified, with a progressive corporate architecture for future scale.
Governance →Legal review is treated as a governance layer across licensing, IP, financing, public communications and deployment—not as an afterthought.
Legal information →Third-party references are used only as contextual evidence. Automated discovery does not mean automated publication or endorsement.
Risk Watch →Assurance principles
These are current project principles and controls—not claims of external certification.
Privileged project information is separated from the public website and managed through authenticated private workflows with role- and page-specific controls.
Security posture evolves with the private platform and deployment context.Material decisions, legal gates, sensitive disclosures and institutional actions are intended to remain attributable and reviewable rather than depending on informal message history.
High-impact actions remain subject to human control.Automation may assist research, qualification, drafting and prioritisation. It should not silently replace human authority for legal commitments, restricted disclosure or other high-risk decisions.
AI assistance is a workflow tool, not a substitute for accountable decision makers.Public information supports initial evaluation. More sensitive commercial, legal, financial, IP or technical material is progressively disclosed only when the relationship and confidentiality context justify it.
The public website is not a confidential data room.Institutional integration is intended to progress through feasibility, defined scope, governance, evaluation criteria and controlled testing before wider deployment.
Production use remains subject to technical and applicable regulatory validation.Security-related concerns can begin through the dedicated public security channel. Do not send credentials, exploit details, confidential files or other sensitive evidence through ordinary email or public forms; first request an appropriate secure channel.
security@taaseco.com · initial contact onlyQualified institutional review
A bank, telecom operator, public institution, strategic partner or investor can begin with public material and move to restricted information only after the purpose and counterpart are qualified.
Use the institutional enquiry workflow for security, legal, integration, pilot, investor, partnership or post-compromise protection questions.
Start institutional enquiry